Andrea here, offering yet another down-the-rabbit-hole research discovery today. I love research, as part of the fun is discovering things you didn’t know you wanted to know! Now, I am not a bellicose person, so I’m not at all interested in an actual boxing match. But as I needed to know a few specifics about ‘pugilism’ for a WIP scene, I had to research a few basic things.
And voila! Down the rabbit hole! Now, in the spirit of full disclosure, I find the history of just about anything fascinating on an intellectual level, and as I happen to like sports (the other Wenches have dubbed me the ‘Wench Jock’) I actually found myself very interested in the resources I found. One of the most intriguing is “Fighting Words," an online exhibit from the Hesburgh Libraries at the University of Notre Dame, from which I have cheerful poached some of the following information.
According to the exhibit, boxing has a long and storied tradition in Britain. Newspapers mentioned boxing matches as far back as 1681. And it was prevalent enough that a national champion—a fellow named James Figg—was recognized by the 1720s. As befits a country that takes both honor and sports seriously, Britain was a leader in codifiying the regulations for fighting. Jack Broughton, a champion pugilist in his own right, published the first rules in 1743 and they were used for nearly 100 years before they were replaced by the London Prize Ring rules in 1838.
Backed by some wealthy patrons, Broughton opened his own amphitheater and staged boxing matches, But in 1750 he was struck in the eye and partially blinded, which forced his retirement. (Word is, he went into the antiques business . . . Chairs and tables don't hit back!) see an engraving of the incident above left.
As many of you know from your reading of Regency novels, boxing was very popular in Regency times. A “mill” featuring well-known fighters, would draw huge crowds, even though the authorities would try to break it up. (I still haven’t managed to find out whether boxing matches were actually illegal back then. A deeper dive is needed!)
Other famous fighters were Daniel Mendoza and Gentleman Jackson. That last name should strike a bell, as many Regency bucks learned the art of fisticuffs at his boxing salon on Bond Street. (I love that the UND exhibit features a large engraving of Jackson’s fist!)
Another very famous bout was between the world champion, Tom Cribb and the American titan, Tom Molineaux in 1811. Cribb had beaten Molineaux for the title of World Champion in 1810, but there was a protest because Molineaux had been injured by the rowdy crowd. A rematch drew a huge crowd, and Cribb once again was victorious.
I also found that a really fascinating character in the history of pugilism in the Regency was Pierce Egan. A careful observer of life and culture in Britain, he wrote Boxiana, a five volume compendium on the world of Regency boxing, including accounts of various bouts, and sketches of the various characters involved, which to this day draw accolades for their “you are there” flavor. In fact, he’s considered by many to be the father of sports journalism.
Jonathan Badcock, who wrote as John Bee, was another Regency writer who got “down and dirty,” frequenting the pubs and and other haunts of ill-repute that drew the boxing crowd. So his journalism also had a air of authenticity.
A striking artistic creation is a highlight of the UND exhibit. Robert Cruikshank, a noted print artist of the Regency, created a panoramic etching—it’s about 14 feet long—which depicts gentlemen spectators traveling to a “mill!” I’ve showcased some of the strips here. Apparently there is only one surviving copy of the actual set of prints all attached together and fitted into the wooden case that unrolls it. And I was delighted to discover that it’s at the Yale British Art Center, which is near where I live. So I will definitely be making a special trip up there to see it in person.
So, what about you? Are you a sports fan? Do you like to watch sporting events, and if so, what’s your favorite ones? Any boxing fans here?
Fascinating post, Andrea, and amazing that you found an engraving of Jackson's fist! He must have been formidable indeed. I can't say I'm a huge sports fan - my favourite is ice hockey - but if I have a person or team to cheer for, I'm happy to watch most things.
Posted by: Christina Courtenay | Friday, June 10, 2022 at 02:21 AM
Andrea, as interesting as the boxiana is, what most intrigued me was your description of the 14' long Cruikshank etching of 'going to the boxing match.' Wonderful that you can see the last of the original versions in your own backyard, but it's an intriguing example of a 19th century art form, the long, enveloping painting of a famous site. There is one in the museum at Gettysburg that encircles a whole room and one enters the viewing area from below. It's a real 'you are there' viewing example, and I know there were a number of such things done in--first half of the 19th century? Or maybe somewhat longer? Some of these expanded scenes were toured to different towns and people paid to see them. Have fun visiting your boxing scene!
Posted by: Mary Jo Putney | Friday, June 10, 2022 at 08:15 AM
The only sport that interests me at all is figure skating and the last thing that I would want to see is two people punching each other. In the early days of TV I would watch wrestling with my dad because it was TV and TV was such a novelty that I would have watched anything. I usually fell asleep watching it.
But I love following you guys down the rabbit hole. I like to chase those rabbits myself. Back in the day I had to use encyclopedias. The Internet makes it so much easier. Loved this post.
Posted by: Mary T | Friday, June 10, 2022 at 09:55 AM
What a fascinating post, Andrea! (Admittedly, I can't see the charm of voluntarily being hit by another person.) I am indeed familiar with Gentleman Jackson,so it was neat to see his fist.
Posted by: Kareni | Friday, June 10, 2022 at 10:43 AM
Fun post, Andrea. It brings all those scenes at Jackson's much more into focus. I do like to watch sports, actually. I used to watch baseball, but it's not on broadcast TV much any more. I've occasionally gotten caught up in college basketball tournaments and selected football games. Over the years, I've loved to watch Olympic sports such as ice skating and gymnastics and the diving. And I've discovered to my amazement that I enjoy watching the occasional golf tournament. Two of my friends are rabid golfers and they don't mind the more-than-occasional dumb questions.
Posted by: Binnie Syril Braunstein | Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 12:52 AM
I like most sports but am not keen on martial arts, particularly boxing where the aim is to render the opponent unconscious.
Soccer, cricket, athletics and tennis are favorites, probably because I have participated in my time.
Fascinating to see the history of pugilism laid out like this. Puts Gentleman Jackson's boxing salon in perspective .... thanks!
Posted by: Quantum | Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 02:13 AM
I recently found myself rereading a lot of Georgette Heyer and one of the titles was "Regency Buck", which opens with the heroine and her brother arriving at Grantham to find the town crowded with spectators who were there for the second Cribb-Molineaux fight. We get a fairly detailed account of the brother attending the fight - no respectable women spectators of course - and I have to admit that this is pretty much the only thing I've ever read about old style pugilism.
So clearly another author has been down the rabbit hole before you. I assume that the book's account is pretty reliable as Heyer cared a lot about history (even though she was constructing a fantasy Georgette-Heyer Land). However, she was not infallible as I noticed a minor military detail that is probably wrong - which I had missed in a couple of prior readings, and anyway I can dream up a bit of back story to justify it if pushed (hence my "probably").
Definitely not a boxing fan myself. In fact, since I got old I pretty much only watch the cricket, other sports having dropped by the wayside.
Posted by: Mike | Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 03:43 AM
I am not a sports afficionado and I can't say that I care for boxing at all.
Still the question about the legal issues around boxing mills is interesting so I couldn't help myself and went down a few rabbit holes myself.
I assume you've seen this article https://edoc.hu-berlin.de/bitstream/handle/18452/17268/ungar.pdf?sequence=1 which on pp. 39 to 45 deals with the legal issues of prize fighting. Apparently there was no law directly against boxing, but prize fights were often seen as breaches of peace (against which there were laws) The article also states that it was basically up to the local magistrate how he viewed pugilism. So there was no uniform practice.
Posted by: Katja | Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 05:39 AM
Thanks, Christina! So glad you enjoyed the post. I've read so much about Gentleman Jackson, and have mentioned him in my Regency novels, so it was such fun to discover the engraving of hs first! He really was a celebrity in his day!
Posted by: Andrea Penrose | Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 05:45 AM
Mary Jo, these panorama prints really are amazing. I think people were so curious to see parts of the country or famous places that they weren't able to visit, so loved getting a real flavor for what they looked liked. Armchair traveling before the age of photography! I can't wait to go see the original!
Posted by: Andrea Penrose | Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 05:48 AM
Thank you, Mary. Glad you enjoy the dives down the rabbit holes!
LOL on watching wrestling! I re,member doing that with my brothers! Such a spectacle!
I am not a boxing fan, but I enjoy the major tennis and golf tournaments. (Nobody is punching their competitors!)
Posted by: Andrea Penrose | Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 05:50 AM
Yes, I have no desire to have someone "plant a facer" on me either, Kareni!
The Gentleman Jackson fist was delightful to discover. The rabbit holes really are fun!
Posted by: Andrea Penrose | Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 05:52 AM
Glad you enjoyed the post, Binnie. I like watching golf, too, as I took it up a while back and now appreciate how hard it is to do well! I actually do enjoy watching lots of sports, especially the Olympics, big tournaments like the college basketball, or major sporting events like the World Series or Wimbledon. But definitely not a fan of seeing two people pummel each other!
Posted by: Andrea Penrose | Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 05:55 AM
Quantum, I, too, like watching sports that I've played. So I enjoy the major tennis tournaments, and soccer too, as my brothers both played a lot of it.
The gentleman Jackson info was fun to discover—especially the fist!
Posted by: Andrea Penrose | Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 05:57 AM
Mike, I had forgotten about that scene in Regency Buck! Yes, mills were a huge draw for Regency gentlemen, (definitely no ladies allowed, though I'm sure some disguised themselves as men and went out of curiosity!)
Heyer did make some things up, but was pretty accurate about most things. Interesting about the military error . . .but no matter how much you research, it's not always easy to get everything right!
Posted by: Andrea Penrose | Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 06:01 AM
Katja, thanks SO much for this. I kept finding mention that the authorities would often try prevent or break up the big gatherings, and this explains why!
Posted by: Andrea Penrose | Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 06:04 AM
I have ended up seeing my share of boxing matches, mostly due to a couple of men in my life who wanted to watch them. I developed an interest, back when we watched on a black & white TV. The first time I saw a fight on a color TV I was shocked by the blood!
Posted by: Karin | Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 07:45 AM
You have some great illustrations. I have some of the books mentioned but mostly for reference and research. I don't much care for sports, except horse racing,and was glad when I finally didn't have to watch any after all the children were settled with their own TVs. Never have liked boxing. I confess to liking the old sword fighting scenes in movies though modern fencing doesn't seem to have the same fascination.
Posted by: nancy | Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 08:09 AM
Thanks for the post. The pictures are amazing. I am a sports nut. I like nearly all sports. But, I am not a fan of boxing. People beating on one another is not entertainment to me. I like hockey, but at least when they hit one another, they are wearing pads.
Thanks again for the post. And the panorama is amazing.
Hope everyone is well.
Posted by: Annette N | Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 09:51 AM
Right now it is fishing. I enjoy reading about the “angler” of the 1700-1800s. Some were fly fishing.
Posted by: Cyn | Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 10:14 AM
That fist picture was so interesting! My fist doesn't look anything like that (totally different position of the thumb), but I imagine one's hand/fist is as different from another's as fingerprints are.
Why I was fascinated, though, is because of a snippet in a recently read Regency in which a male was teaching a female how to form a fist to defend herself better: thumb on the outside, not inside the fingers. Try it, it's true! Much more solid and stable, less likely to get your thumb broken, and (for us females) a chance for that thumbnail to do some extra damage.
Needless to say, I hope I never have to try this out for real.
Posted by: Mary M. | Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 11:00 AM
I watch a lot of sports on tv. Snooker, darts, tennis and soccer would be the big one for me. I used to watch boxing but I think it's all gone a bit staged now so don't bother so much. In Ireland we have the female boxing champ, Katie Taylor. I watch some of her fights. They're not always accessible here. She's done a lot for women's sports around the world.
Lovely pics you provided Andrea.
Posted by: Teresa Broderick | Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 12:06 PM
I'm not a boxing fan, but I have an interesting boxing connection in my family history. One of my great-grandfathers was born on 17 April 1861, the one year anniversary of the international boxing championship between American John C. Heenan and English boxer Tom Sayers, so he was named "Heenan Sayers Lhamon" -- though he generally went by Hank.
I do follow a number of other sports though, baseball in particular, and last year began watching hockey as my area got a new team.
Posted by: Jane Irish Nelson | Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 01:03 PM
Yes, boxing in full color is pretty gruesome! And what we've learned about head injuries is very scary.
Posted by: Andrea Penrose | Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 07:15 PM
I'll watch Cary Elwes fence anytime! Those scenes in Princess Bride were fabulous!
Posted by: Andrea Penrose | Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 07:17 PM
Glad you enjoyed the pictures, Annette. The panorama does look amazing, and I hope to see it in person.
I'm not a boxing fan either!
Posted by: Andrea Penrose | Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 07:18 PM
I totally get fishing! It's very zen-like, especially fly-fishing. It was very popular in the Regency (and most every era!) It also has wonderful art and good literature written but it.
Posted by: Andrea Penrose | Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 07:20 PM
That's fascinating about how to make a fist for hitting someone. (I had two brothers, so I did learn that as a kid!) I hope you never have to use the knowledge, but it's good to know.
Posted by: Andrea Penrose | Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 07:23 PM
Glad you enjoyed the pictures, Teresa. I know there are a lot of women boxing now, and I do understand that there is art and skill involved. But seeing someone hit just makes me wince. I find it hard to watch.
Posted by: Andrea Penrose | Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 07:25 PM
What a fun story, Jane! That was quite a mouthful for great-grandfather.
I like the speed of hockey. They can be rough, but pads help, and I've been told by guys who play hockey that the fighting isn't as bad as it looks because when balancing on skates, it's hard to throw a punch with any "pop"!
Posted by: Andrea Penrose | Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 07:29 PM
Thank you for this really fascinating and detailed post.
You may be interested to read this blog about a Regency Corinthian, Berkeley Craven, second son of Elizabeth Craven, who was a noted fan of boxing, and attended some celebrated matches - to bet, of course!
https://elizabethberkeleycraven.blogspot.com/2021/09/the-hon-henry-berkeley-craven-regency.html
Posted by: Julia Gasper | Tuesday, June 14, 2022 at 04:36 AM