Susanna here.
In an earlier post, we talked about the hero in the library. But libraries are nothing without books, and in there are times in a novel when someone has to actually take a book off the shelf and do something with it, so today I thought it might be fun to share how I go about stocking the shelves for my characters.
Since most of my books are twin-stranded, I probably ought to point out that I mean the historical characters, since when it comes to the modern-day ones I just let them take what they want from my own bookcases (and I know at least two of them, in separate books, have “borrowed” Wilkie Collins’s The Moonstone…)
But the historical characters pose a particular challenge. I have to consider not only the time that they’re living in, but where they’re living (the New World or Old? Town or country?), their social position, the language (or languages) that they can read, and their politics, and their religion, before I can start to guess what books they might have acquired for themselves, let alone what they might have inherited.
As a former museum curator born into a family of amateur genealogists, the first place I head when I’m stocking a fictional library is straight to primary documents—catalogues from auction houses, notices of book sales and new publications that were posted in old newspapers of the day (thankfully still preserved by resources like the British Newspaper Archive), and probate inventories—those magical lists attached to many old wills, giving detailed accounts of what people owned at the time of their death, including their paintings and drawings and books.
Of course, probate inventories were written for the sole purpose of putting a value to those belongings, not to create a Useful Resource for Writers of a Later Century, and they tend to assume that the person reading them is familiar enough with the publications of the day to know that “Tisiot—1 vol.” means: Advice to People in General, with Respect to Their Health, by Samuele Auguste David Tissot, translated from his earlier French edition and published at Edinburgh in 1768, in two volumes, one of which apparently made it into the inventory.
If I just want to have an idea of what books were published in any given year, there’s always the Gentlemen’s Magazine (published from 1731 through 1907), which helpfully included an Index to the Register of Books at the back of each edition.
To choose a year at random—in 1737, a handful of the many titles featured in that index were: Tryals of Pyrates, Grey’s Art of Memory, Character of Quacks, Dissertation on Mandrakes, Gordon on Mummies, Hamilton on Fevers, King on Bathing, and the intriguing Scotch Prophecy.
And if I take one of those titles—say, Grey’s Art of Memory—and do a little searching on the website archive.org (a treasure trove of scanned old books), I can find the book itself: Memoria Technica: Or, a New Method of Artificial Memory, by Richard Grey, D. D., Rector of Hinton in Northamptonshire. The one on archive.org is the second edition, published in 1732, so the 1737 edition noted in the Gentleman’s magazine must be even more “new and improved”.
A little more digging, and I learn the first edition was published in 1730—so, since the novella I’m writing right now is set in 1733, this might be a good book to give to one of my characters, or put on the shelf in the public lounge in the small inn where they’re stranded together. Perhaps it was left there by one of the inn’s former guests…
And that’s how I start building a fictional library.
Sometimes, I’ve been known to cross the line between the fictional and real, when a particularly tempting old book comes my way. I couldn’t resist adding this copy of Madame D’Aulnoy’s Travels Into Spain to my collection while I was working on A Desperate Fortune.
It’s always a special feeling for me to hold an old book, and think about the people who’ve held and enjoyed it before me. But by far the most special part about holding this one for the first time was discovering the faded bookplates inside the front cover that announced it had belonged to the Cathedral Library of Ely, having been donated to them by the Canon of Ely, the Rev R. A. Perkins, L.L.D., in 1732—the very same year A Desperate Fortune was set.
I chose to take that as a Sign the well-loved book was meant to find its way to me, all these years after it was published. And I confess I wish I'd had the chance to browse the Reverend R. A. Perkins's entire book collection, because any man who had Madame D'Aulnoy on his shelves was likely someone with an interesting mind.
I realize my overly fussy techniques aren't for everyone, but what book, new or old, would you add to a hero or heroine’s library, if you were building one?
A most interesting post. I would never have thought about old books in these way, so now you have intrigued me.
I don't think I have any favorite as such. — Although I always thriledl by finding characters reading a novel by "the author of 'Sense and Sensibility'" because I know this is true to the period. (I also know that she wasn't as popular then as she is today.) My pleasure is diminished if the author is named in the novel I'm reading.
Posted by: Sue McCormick | Friday, May 11, 2018 at 09:51 AM
Susanna, I am AWED! You're adding a whole new layer of authenticity to your wonderful books. And I'll bet you have so much fun researching these books that it's hard to tear yourself away. *G*
Posted by: Mary Jo Putney | Friday, May 11, 2018 at 01:01 PM
Thank you for a fascinating post, Susanna. I'll now be paying more attention to what the characters in historical novels are reading.
Posted by: Kareni | Friday, May 11, 2018 at 01:01 PM
Wow, Susanna — I'm impressed. I never go into this much detail in my books. I might occasionally mention a book title that's relevant, but that's as far as I go.
I do love that so many of these old books are available on line. I've made good use of some travelers' journals from the time and place setting of my books, but that's about all.
Posted by: Anne Gracie | Friday, May 11, 2018 at 04:08 PM
Every period does have different conventions for naming the author (or not), although there are always exceptions.
I'm just very glad "the author of 'Sense and Sensibility'" continues to find new readers in our modern age, because her books are lovely :-)
Posted by: Susanna Kearsley | Friday, May 11, 2018 at 06:35 PM
It's one of my most favourite rabbit holes. I can get lost reading those books, and often find passages or phrases that end up triggering bits of a scene or an exchange of dialogue between my own characters. It's really fun!
Posted by: Susanna Kearsley | Friday, May 11, 2018 at 06:36 PM
Glad you enjoyed it, Kareni. I do love old books.
Posted by: Susanna Kearsley | Friday, May 11, 2018 at 06:37 PM
I'll make a convert of you yet, Anne :-) Tell you what, next novel you work on, perhaps you should have me find a book or two for your heroine's library...?
Posted by: Susanna Kearsley | Friday, May 11, 2018 at 06:39 PM
I adore coming across authentic details in Regencies and other historical novels. I get a feeling of belonging to some delicious secret society. (Conversely, throw me an incorrect factoid like "they went shopping in a pantheon"—ugh—and I'm out of that book in a flash.) More than once I've Kindle-clicked through to a mentioned book/author (e.g., Fanny Burney, Ann Radcliffe, Horace Walpole's Castle of Otranto) and snuggled even deeper into a world I can only visit through books.
Posted by: Mary M. | Saturday, May 12, 2018 at 02:53 AM
Old books! The smell! The feel! Heaven!!!!!
Posted by: Teresa Broderick | Saturday, May 12, 2018 at 02:02 PM
To tell the truth, unless the book was relevant to the story I was reading, I don't think I would take much notice of it.
However, I do understand the affinity for old books. I have two school books from the 1920s. One belonged to my mother and the other to an aunt who died when she was just 18 - many years before I was born. I also have a prayer book that belonged to a great aunt that dates back to the 19th century.
Every now and then I go through purging periods where I want to get rid of things I don't need or no longer use any longer. These are not important books, but for some reason, I have just never been able to let them go. When I pick them up and touch them it is almost like touching my ancestors who owned them once upon a time.
Posted by: Mary T | Saturday, May 12, 2018 at 03:32 PM
How I loved your sharing your library authenticity research in this post. Whenever I read how impressed Elizabeth is with the vastness of Pemberley's library and is told it has been the efforts by several generations of Darcys, I want to be there myself looking at those shelves discovering those books. And every time an author names the shared love of certain authors, poets or book titles I highlight those on my e-reader. And try to remember to look them up later. I love these historic details.
However, if I were a time traveler alas, today an average education no longer has students learning to read in multiple languages, so many of those titles would be lost to me.
Posted by: Michelle H | Saturday, May 12, 2018 at 05:05 PM