Hi. Jo Beverley here delighted to welcome Margaret Evans Porter back to the Word Wenches. Margaret is an award-winning, bestselling novelist with a life-long interest in British history, and she generously shares her investigations.
Today she's blogging about Hampton Court Palace, one of the royal palaces. It plays a part in her first mainstream historical novel, A Pledge of Better Times. "A sweeping tale of ambition, treachery, and passion For generations Lady Diana de Vere’s family loyally served England’s crown. But after King Charles II’s untimely death, her father firmly opposes James II’s tyranny. Charles Beauclerk, Duke of St. Albans—the late king’s bastard son by actress Nell Gwyn—also rebels against his newly crowned uncle’s manipulation.
Political and religious turmoil bring revolution and yet another coronation before Charles returns to from war to claim his promised bride. In palace corridors and within their own household the young duke and duchess confront betrayals, scandals, and tragedies that threaten to divide them. And neither the privileges of birth nor proximity to the throne can ensure their security, their advancement—or their happiness."
That sounds thrilling, Margaret. I look forward to how Hampton Court plays a part.
Margaret Evans Porter.
As a teenager, entirely unaware of the impact it would have upon my future, I spent a full day Hampton Court Palace. On that initial visit I had my pocket journal, and at some point I recorded my thoughts my chief impression: “Never has history seemed so alive to me.” I was very much taken with the gardens. “I think every flower is in bloom. The roses are as big as my face.” Lunch was a picnic on the grass. I got lost in the maze—temporarily.
Certainly I never guessed that Diana’s lovely face would someday grace the cover of my twelfth book and first mainstream historical novel, released last week. A Pledge of Better Times features Diana, her father, Queen Mary II, and Charles Beauclerk, 1st Duke of St. Albans—bastard son of King Charles II and actress Nell Gwyn—all of whom were caught up in the political turmoil and transitions of the late 17th century.
I can’t tell how many times I’ve wandered Hampton Court’s splendid rooms and spacious grounds. Over the past decade, charting the friendship between Diana and Queen Mary II and pursuing in-depth research its development, I returned as often as I could.
The Glorious Revolution of 1688 brought William and Mary to the throne, at which time they expressed an immediate and shared distaste for Whitehall—at that time the largest royal palace in all Europe. Its proximity to the river worsened William’s asthma. Convinced that rural Hampton Court would suit them better, they planned to raze the famed Tudor towers and commission an entirely new building from Sir Christopher Wren. Fortunately for architectural scholars and Tudor-era fans, the original plan proved unfeasible and too costly. So Wren proposed a modern extension to the historic building, and work began in 1689.
Mary, a keen palace and garden designer, was a very hands-on overseer of the process and responsible for the renovation of the Water Gallery. This compact building beside the Thames contained several rooms, including a dining room, and tall windows with a rear balcony from which she could observe her builders’ progress and the creation of her new gardens in fashionable—and formal—French style. To fill the narrow spaces between the windows, Mary commissioned a set of twelve portraits of court ladies. Lady Diana de Vere, daughter of Aubrey, 20th Earl of Oxford, was one of them.
As Daniel Defoe observed, “The Queen had here her gallery of beauties, being the pictures, at full length, of the principal ladies attending upon her majesty…with a set of lodgings, for her private retreat only, but most exquisitely furnished; particularly a fine chintz bed…and here was also her majesty’s fine collection of Delft ware.”
The five-hour journey from London to Hampton was great inconvenience for ministers and members of the Privy Council. As work continued at Hampton Court, the King and Queen purchased Lord Nottingham’s house at Kensington as more convenient and less palatial residence.
With Queen Mary’s death from smallpox after Christmas in 1694, William’s interest in Hampton Court declined, work abruptly halted, and he relied on Windsor Castle as his country retreat. Not until the prospect of peace with France and the cessation of an expensive war did the rebuilding proceed. The Queen’s Water Gallery was demolished to make room for a square banqueting pavilion with a bowling green, and though her suite of rooms was completed, they remained unoccupied. In 1702 William, an avid huntsman, fell from his horse Sorrel—who stumbled in a mole’s burrow—and broke his shoulder. During his recovery from this accident he succumbed to a lung infection that proved fatal and he died at Kensington House. His successor, Queen Anne rarely visited Hampton Court.
During my time there researching A Pledge of Better Times, I’ve walked in my characters’ footsteps, imagining their conversations, their hopes and dreams, their struggles. And as I did on that very first visit so long ago, I eat a picnic lunch—and inevitably become lost in the maze!
Thank you, Margaret.
I wonder how many of our blog readers have visited Hampton Court, or one of the other royal palaces.
Readers, do you enjoy fiction about real people and real events? Is the reign of William and Mary new to you? Would you have liked to live at a royal court, or would it be too dangerous or too formal for you?
We welcome any and all comments, and one lucky commenter will win a copy of A Pledge of Better Times.
Jo
Raising hand as having visited Hampton Court. I was lucky enough to be there for a costumed performance of Tudor dances, too. I managed to walk about five feet into the maze before chickening out and retracing my steps. Good thing my characters are braver than I am! I don't think I've read any novels set in the reign of William and Mary, but A Pledge of Better Times just went on my to read list. Margaret--so glad to hear you have a new book out.
Kathy (aka Kate) Emerson
Posted by: Kathy Lynn Emerson | Wednesday, April 22, 2015 at 06:49 AM
I've also visited Hampton Court a couple of times, and fell in love with the maze. Not coincidentally, mazes have figured in a couple of my books. *G*
Margaret, thanks so much for visiting us today! I've been listening to interesting tidbits about this book from you for years, and finally I have a chance to read it. It's a fascinating period of history, and I know you'll bring it to vivid life.
Posted by: Mary Jo Putney | Wednesday, April 22, 2015 at 08:22 AM
Kathy, I've been there during Tudor events as well! The chaps working in the kitchens are a delight to observe.
My husband isn't keen about entering the maze with me...but I never mind getting lost in it.
Posted by: margaret porter | Wednesday, April 22, 2015 at 08:23 AM
Mary Jo, mazes and labyrinths fascinate me. I have a secret desire to design one, but I don't think I'm clever enough to do it successfully! It's a pleasure to join the Wenches again--I believe this is my 5th (?) time.
Posted by: margaret porter | Wednesday, April 22, 2015 at 08:25 AM
I love labyrinths, but mazes not so much. Labyrinths are soothing, but mazes make me anxious.
Posted by: Jobev | Wednesday, April 22, 2015 at 11:23 AM
I like the puzzle of mazes...until I end up hopelessly puzzled by them. There is a trick to working one's way through them without any difficulty, but I never do remember it before entering!
Posted by: margaret porter | Wednesday, April 22, 2015 at 11:52 AM
King Henry VIII's kitchen was the highlight of Hampton Court for me. Costumed volunteers brought Tudor times to life, cooking over braziers and in the huuuge fireplace, showing us the spices used in that era (to preserve the fresh and deodorize the not-so-fresh), explaining table settings, etc. Amazing to think of the history in that palace, but a little hard to "feel it" with all the tourists milling around. Still, an experience not to be missed.
Posted by: Mary M. | Wednesday, April 22, 2015 at 05:39 PM
I've not been lucky enough to visit, but would love to! I do appreciate when historical novels actually include real people and events. Of course, unless it is an alternate universe or complete farce, I don't like when the real historical figures act totally out of character.
Posted by: Glenda | Wednesday, April 22, 2015 at 07:05 PM
Mary, I agree, the Tudor kitchens are indeed a highlight of any visit to Hampton Court! The cooks and food historians are as entertaining as they are knowledgeable.
Posted by: margaret porter | Thursday, April 23, 2015 at 05:57 AM
Glenda, most author of historical fiction--every genre of it--strive to create characters true to their times, real or fictional. In a way it's easiest, dealing with known figures about whom much has been written, or left behind a legacy of their own writings. But opinions of those historical figures can alter over time. The author must therefore determine his or her own vision of that character to serve the story. But carefully--or else the very knowledgeable reader will have a problem with the portrayal!
Posted by: margaret porter | Thursday, April 23, 2015 at 06:01 AM
I've never been to Hampton Court, alas. I actually think writing about true historical figures in historical fiction grounds the book; the links to facts often drive me to go read more about the real people. My closest link to William and Mary was watching a public television depiction of them from years ago! And no, I would have had no desire to live at court. I think the constant intrigue would have been draining....
Posted by: ML | Thursday, April 23, 2015 at 07:36 AM
ML, thanks for commenting. I gained a lot of sympathy for those whose fates were directly tied to obtaining--and keeping--the good favour of the monarch. Serving in a royal court was not for sissies!
Posted by: margaret porter | Thursday, April 23, 2015 at 08:32 AM
So unsettling to walk in from the 21s century to the rooms and walks actual historical people knew.
Like a time machine.
Posted by: Laura Watkins | Thursday, April 23, 2015 at 11:02 AM
That's so true, Margaret. I often come across mentions of how hard and tricky it was.
Posted by: Jo Beverley | Thursday, April 23, 2015 at 11:58 AM
I so enjoy visting historical places as you really get a sense of size, though without the huge pannier skirts of the ladies of the court there was probably much less room. I love stories based on real events and persons. They remind me that history is STORY and should be taught that way rather than the dry stuff one finds in many texts and classrooms.
Posted by: LynS | Thursday, April 23, 2015 at 05:40 PM
As I think about accuracy in historical novels, it is more a true sense of feel rather than totally accurate dialogue and behavior. Yet I find myself more accepting of time travel than I do of someone serving a potato in 1300s England.
Posted by: LynS | Thursday, April 23, 2015 at 05:42 PM
Lyn, I so agree. I'm sure I learned more from reading historical novels as a child than I ever did in history classes at school. A few teachers had the gift of making the past sing for us, but most didn't.
Posted by: Anne Gracie | Friday, April 24, 2015 at 05:53 AM
Unfortunately I have never visited Hampton Court or any of the other British palaces, but I have been to some of the more famous ones on the Continent, like Versailles, and Schonbrunn in Vienna.
This book sounds fascinating, because I know almost nothing about James II's reign. I do like when real characters are incorporated into historic fiction.
Posted by: Karin | Friday, April 24, 2015 at 07:36 AM
It can be unsettling, Laura. It's always so odd when I'm there before Christmas and see the ice-skating rink set up on the grounds at the entrance to Hampton Court. It seems incongruous, until I remind myself that the uncrowned King Charles II and his courtiers-in-exile often entertained themselves with skating on the frozen Dutch canals!
Posted by: margaret porter | Friday, April 24, 2015 at 08:21 AM
Lyn, that is such a good point--history is story. If it's taught only with dates and timelines it can be very dull indeed. But when it includes personalities and their motivations and their conflicts with one another, it is fascinating!
And as historical novelists, we always must remember we are writing to entertain, primarily.
Posted by: margaret porter | Friday, April 24, 2015 at 08:23 AM
It's a balancing act, providing sense of time and place, yet at the same time writing for a modern readership. Completely accurate 17th century dialogue would be mystifying to the average 21st century person...but it's possible to give the flavour of the vernacular without overdoing it!
Posted by: margaret porter | Friday, April 24, 2015 at 08:25 AM
There are a couple of scenes at Versailles, Karin, which is an amazing place. I've been to Vienna but hadn't time to see Schonbrunn. I plan to return, because it will figure in a future novel! I am prepared to be overwhelmed by the grandeur!
Posted by: margaret porter | Friday, April 24, 2015 at 08:26 AM
Thank you, Margaret, for a very interesting blog.
The randomly picked winner is LynS. Congratulations, Lyn. Margaret will be in touch with you.
Posted by: Jobev | Sunday, April 26, 2015 at 12:03 PM
Thank you so much, Margaret.
The winner of a copy of A Pledge of Better Times is LynS.
Congratulations, Lyn.
Posted by: Jobev | Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 11:55 AM