Jo here, delighted to welcome the wonderful writer, Mary Balogh, who is both a fellow Brit -- Mary's Welsh and I'm English, and a fellow Canadian. Mary, welcome to Word Wenches. It's a delight to have you visit, especially when you're riding so high. Your current book, At Last Comes Love, entered the NYT paperback bestseller list at #2. That's brilliant!
Mary: Thank you for having me. I like the company!
Jo: You started writing in the early '80s at about the same time I did, but were published faster - in 1985. I think your approach of sending the manuscript to the distribution center in Mississauga (you can read the story on Mary's web site ) was better than mine -- dilly-dallying, then sending it to Walker because I'd seen their books in the library! Back in those days, there was so little information and guidance.
Mary: And I, it seems, was a greater greenhorn than you!
Jo: Can you tell us a little more about that particular time when you went from thinking about writing a book, dreaming about writing a book, to actually doing it?
Mary: I always wanted to be an author. As a child I used to write long, long stories. Of course, one has to be more practical when one grows up--I became a high school English teacher. And other things interfere with mere dreams too--hormones and marriage and motherhood, for example. Finally, when the youngest of my three children was in school, I started to be able to read again.
It was wonderful for a while, until I realized it was too passive an activity. And I kept getting impatient with so many books I read, convinced that I could have done so much better with the material, and especially with book endings. And then I pulled a Harlequin romance out of a Corn Flakes box and read it, and then, a little later, I discovered the books of Georgette Heyer.
So it was a combination of influences that pushed me in the fall of 1983 to sit down at the dining room table in the evenings and write a story long-hand.
After three months I had finished it (A MASKED DECEPTION), and I typed it out on an ancient typewriter and then bundled it up and sent it off with a brief covering letter to that distribution centre in Canada. Greenhorn on the move!
Jo: I think it's reassuring for new writers to learn that most of us made mistakes at the beginning. How many books have you had published now?
Mary: I think it's about 70 novels and about 30 novellas.
Jo: All your stories have been Regency or Georgian. Have you any interest in writing in another period?
Mary: I did write two Welsh historicals (LONGING and TRULY) set in Wales in the late 1830s and one book (TANGLED) set during the Crimean War. But by far the vast majority of my books are Regency. And the rest will probably stay in that era. I feel no great pull to any other historical era. I adored writing the Georgians (all those gorgeous, sexy, very dangerous males with their fans and makeup and high-heeled shoes and small-swords at their sides!) and felt quite uncomfortable with the Victorian, but the Regencies
fit me like a glove.
Jo: So many readers love the Regency. What do you see as the magic of the period?
Mary: This is what I am hoping readers of this blog will tell me--and the best answer will be rewarded with a copy of my new hardcover due out at the end of May--SEDUCING AN ANGEL. It's not an easy question to answer, is it? What it is about the Regency period that makes so many people feel almost nostalgic, as though they had lived there very happily in a former life?
Jo: There, dear readers -- your challenge, and with a grand prize. The Regency period is undoubtedly a magical one for romance. So why do you love it? If you don't, it'd be interesting to hear why on that, too. Have at it!
I do have a concern, Mary. Do you think it's possible for the period to be worked to death, or do you think the appeal is eternal?
Mary: I don't think any topic or genre or era can ever be worked to death if it turns out that someone has something fresh and new and wonderful to say. That is the key, though. It is very easy to start finding secret baby books or vampire books or any other fashionable types of book tedious when they are mediocre or repetitive. But if someone writes a great Regency or whatever, suddenly it doesn't matter that a thousand other such books have gone before it.
Jo: An excellent point, Mary. "Regency romance" has changed over time. It once meant the "traditional Regency romance," which are the books we both wrote when we started. Now most Regencies are historicals. Do you have any thoughts about future changes? Are there any new directions you'd like to see it take?
Mary: As far as I'm concerned, the Regency is simply an historical era. It is a setting, a background for a story.
Jo: I agree with you there. I've always tried not to link the period in my mind with an author, be it Heyer or Austen, or a particular story type or writing style.
Mary: Even when I was writing the trad Regencies, no one could ever explain to me how they were different from the "historical" Regencies some people were starting to write, apart from the length, that is.
(Side comment from Jo. Even in length we didn't always have much difference. My first Rogues books were published as trad Regencies, and they were over 100,000 words, which is typical of a historical now.)
Mary: People used to accuse me of breaking the rules, but no one could ever produce those rules. The type of Regency I write now is the same type of Regency I have always written, except that in more than twenty years I hope I have grown as a person and improved as a writer. I always strive to do something different with each book, but that is relatively easy because my books are about people, and there are infinite differences in people.
Jo: Yes, that's the key. I agree.
Mary: I don't really mind if the Regency heads off in a vast number of different directions (paranormal Regency, for example). It doesn't matter. What I do want is for it to continue to produce an endless
store of great books that lots of readers will want to read and reread. I don't read much romance, by the way (too much like what I do for a living every day, and I am too afraid of being influenced by tends or even of unconsciously plagiarizing). So I am really not the one to ask about changing trends!
Jo: That's an interesting question to toss out, too. Anyone have any personal view of the development of the Regency romance over the past 20 years or so? And where it might be heading now?
You've had a wonderful career, Mary, and your books are all big bestsellers now, but writing fiction is always a chancy career, with many ups and downs. Can you share any shaky moments along the way?
Mary: Perhaps the shakiest moment for me was when I left my first publisher after many years. My new publisher was the highest bidder at an auction,and they treated me like a queen, including flying me to New York and wining and dining me. They gave my first book with them a huge print-run, and it sold more copies than any of my other books had sold before it. BUT the sell-through was abysmal--below 50%. They promptly lost all interest in me. My numbers plummeted, my editor was never available, they would offer only one-book contracts with exactly the same terms as the one before.
Fortunately, with my agent's help, I reacted swiftly and decisively enough to move from there before my career was quite wrecked--as has happened to many promising authors of my acquaintance in the same sort of situation.
Jo: Yes, I've known such cases, too. Thanks for sharing your story, because it could prove useful to someone else sometime. I always think selling fiction is like having a lottery ticket. Winning is rare, but
sometimes, out of nowhere, we get something wonderful that we hadn't expected. Have you had any of those?
Mary: Well, what has happened to me recently has certainly been like winning a lottery. A couple or so years ago I was preparing to sink happily into semi-retirement, writing one book a year and having the hardcover one year/paperback the next year sort of thing going on. But I had an idea for a quintet of books and didn't really want to see them spread thin over so many years. So I suggested that I write the first three as quickly as I could and that Dell put them out one after the other in paperback--rather as they did a few years ago with my six SLIGHTLY books.
Dell was agreeable and even suggested that the fourth book come out in hardcover right after the first three. That is what is happening now, this spring. And this is the miraculous part and something I certainly couldn't have predicted when I made the original suggestion. With the economic crisis as it is, this is EXACTLY the right time for these books to be out there. My numbers have gone up when many other writers' numbers have gone down, and these books are doing excellently on all the big lists. Usually when things like this happen, it is to someone else--being in exactly the right place at the right time, I mean. I am rather enjoying the fact that this time it's happening to me.
Jo: But like most such wonderful things, fully deserved. Congratulations, again! And yes, sales of romance are doing well. People want pleasure in their reading, and happy endings.
This series is about the Huxtable family. Tell us about them and the books.
Mary: This current series is a quintet. It's about a family of three sisters and a brother and their male second cousin. The siblings were living in genteel poverty in a country village when the news reached them that Stephen, the youngest and only 17 at the time, had inherited an earldom and all that went with it. They all moved to his principal estate and proceeded to deal with the huge changes life had brought them.
Constantine, the second cousin, was actually the eldest son of a former earl but could not inherit himself because his parents married two days after his birth. FIRST COMES MARRIAGE is the story of Vanessa, the middle sister, who is a widow. THEN COMES SEDUCTION is the story of Katherine, the youngest sister. AT LAST COMES LOVE is Margaret's story--she is the eldest. Stephen had to be allowed time to grow up. His story is told in SEDUCING AN ANGEL.
Constantine weaves in and out of the other four stories, and it is never quite clear if he loves or hates his cousins. It is also believed that he stole from his youngest brother, who was earl for three years before his death and who had Downs Syndrome. Con's story, of course, has to be last--and readers are already begging me to write it. I think that because the first four books are coming out this spring, they fear there will not be a story for Con, even though I have always described the series as a quintet. They don't know me very well, do they? How could I possibly leave such a delicious male story-less? I have just started to write his book.
Jo: That confirmation will make your readers very happy. Thank you so much, Mary, for this interview.
So now it's up to you, dear readers. Here's your chance to ask Mary some questions, and don't forget to discuss the questions tossed out here. Why is the Regency period such a magical one for romance? How do you see its history over the past two decades, and how do you expect it to change in the future?
Remember, Mary is giving away TWO copies of the June hardcover, SEDUCING AN ANGEL. One will go to a random pick of all people who comment, but the other will be Mary's choice from the comments on the questions above.
All best wishes,
Jo
Recent Comments