From Susan/Miranda:
Like most writers, I’m a compulsive reader, which of course makes me a book-buyer as well. I’m constitutionally unable to walk by a bookstore, always lured by the siren call of the latest releases. Well, maybe that’s putting a bit strongly (not to say luridly), but I do like to see what’s new on the shelves each week.
Like everyone else, I look for the names of authors I’ve enjoyed in the past. I pick up books with intriguing cover-art, and generally avoid those that depict bullet holes, shards of broken glass, or dead bodies, however artistically portrayed. Next I’ll skim the cover blurbs for a hint of the plot and setting. I don’t pay much attention to quotes from other authors, and figure that review quotes have been edited. But what convinces me finally to buy a book are the first few pages –– if the writer can convince me that I’ll want know more about her/his story and characters. Those first pages are like a first date: will this be only a passing acquaintance, or a long-term relationship?
But publishing is Big Business, and like every other Big Business, publishers are always trying new ways to sell books. As a jaded reader/consumer, I thought I’d seen everything in the way of special displays, discounts, readers’ guides, and membership clubs.
Yet there’s a just-launched promotion in both Borders and Barnes & Noble that’s absolutely made my jaw drop. I don’t know a thing about the book or the author it’s promoting, so I’m not going to mention the title, but if you’ve gone into either one of these stores this week, you know the novel I mean. There are lavish posters, huge displays of stacked books and books-on-CD, reading guides, and book club guides as soon as you step into the store. There’ve been special emails to store members, with all sorts of predictions about this book being an instant classic and future bestseller.
To this previously-unknown author, I wish endless congratulations for having her work so recognized and promoted, and much luck for a long and prosperous career. Forget playing the PowerBall numbers: she’s hit the author jackpot big-time. Over the course of our writing careers, each of us Wenches has been the beneficiary of publisher perks, and we all recognize how important store placements, dumps, and other kinds of point-of-purchase advertising can be to our sales.
But as a reader, I looked at this unprecedented example of expensive hooplah, and just went . . . huh. I’m an ornery consumer. I don’t like being told what to buy, or that I’ll miss out if I don’t. If this same book were sitting with the other new releases, I would have picked it up anyway on account of the promised connection to "Jane Eyre", and given it the first-page test. But seeing it set apart in solitary splendor like this made me suspicious and resistant, the same way that cats can sense there’s medicine buried in the choicest chunk of tuna.
It also made me wonder how many other readers feel the same way. Certainly publishers wouldn’t do this if it didn’t sell books, lots and lots of books. But I’ve overheard disgruntled readers returning big-push books, telling the clerk in no uncertain terms that they want their money back because a book didn’t live up to expectations (something I’d personally never dream of doing –– I just chalk up any turkeys to acceptable risk.) But I’ve also met readers who automatically buy all books that are favorably reviewed in People, or only buy ones that get five stars from Romantic Times.
Now you Wenches and Wenchlings are clearly a discerning bunch. Do you regard a big-splash book like this as a must-read? Do you race out to buy what Oprah or Kelly recommends? Or do you consider the messenger before you buy –– you’ll look for a book your sister recommends, but not one with the glowing review in Publishers Weekly and the biggest advertising budget?
My love affair with historical romance began with a fabulous marketing display.
SHANNA, by Kathleen E. Woodiwiss
A lush tropical cover in deep-hued colors of fuscia hibiscus and jungle leaf teal made me put my hand on the book. It was big book, soft-cover. Trade paperback, I guess. I bought it. I read it. Several times now.
Prior to that I'd read Styron, Dickens, Austen and a host of other "greats."
SHANNA ruined me forever and the story lived up to the hype on the cover. Dear G-d, this gorgeous blonde with a fabulous wardrobe lived in a mansion on her father's tropical island. She sailed half-way around the world, falling in love with a prisoner, who fought pirates for her. The prisoner turns out to be a wealthy colonist!
Good Lord, why would I ever return to tragic fiction again?
Ever since then I resist reading anything that does not end in HEA. Despite all the hooplah, I did not read the DaVinci Code.
Some people think I should be somehow apologetic for my love of SHANNA, and especially Woodiwiss. BUT, I consider myself a loyal reader and fan. Sure, she used "orbs" for eyes way too much, but her writing has provided the flavor for my taste in romance, so I admittedly I like Romance slightly over the top.
And for every other author of historical romance fiction... Kathleen Woodiwiss pulled me into the bookstore's romance aisles and kept me there, searching for new authors. I discovered Garwood, Putney, Chase, Rice, Hendrickson, Kinsale, Kleypas... the list goes on. For each new author I find and love, I get mired deeper and deeper into the genre. My book buying dollars approach obsessive-compulsive in our genre. Which is good for authors!
I do not think I've really wandered far from our topic because I'm discussing what draws me in. Unlike you, Susan, I do read the author endorsement cover blurbs. If MJP says so-and-so is scintillating, or some such thing, I buy the book. I've since learned these are professional courtesies most of the time, but I do not think an author would endorse a crummy book.
Displays only pull me in if something about it intrigues me. I avoid shattered glass, lightning strikes and bloody bodies, too.
I love covers. DUCHESS is beautiful, Susan. I haven't read it yet, but I did buy it. And that counts.
Posted by: Cathy | Monday, September 18, 2006 at 06:45 AM
Nope, store displays won't pull me in, either. And I give very little credence to reviewers online. I'll read just about anything my sister recommends. And I rely on other readers at the message boards I frequent. I will look at the author endorsements and sometimes that will persuade me if it's one of my favorite authors and I was already thinking about trying the book. Mostly, the cover copy (or inside copy) has got to pull me in, with an occasional "That cover is just so great that I've got to try it" decision, though that has only happened about 5 times in the last 10 years.
Posted by: DeniseM | Monday, September 18, 2006 at 08:00 AM
Cathy, I guess I don't pay attention to author quotes because I know that quoting authors often say something nice not so much for the book itself, but because their editor or agent asked them as a favor, or because the authors are friends. Not always, true, but often. And most authors will also find something favorable to praise because they don't want to tempt incurring bad writer-kharma.
Yes, I totally agree that the DUCHESS cover is a beauty. But remember that constipated muppet sea captain from an earlier book: oh, yes, I do believe in writer-kharma....!
And yes, yes, yes, buying a book ALWAYS counts. :) Thank you!
Denise, I'm a total sucker for covers. Make it beautiful, or intriguing, or just bright or sparkly, and I pick up that book like a magpie with a bottle-cap.
True confession: I first discovered Laura Kinsale when I bought "Lord of Midnight" for the Fabio cover. Shallow, shallow....:)
Posted by: shscott21 | Monday, September 18, 2006 at 08:06 AM
I don't pay any attention to marketing. I'm glad to see it if I like the author because I want them to do well, but it doesn't affect my buying. I read reviews in magazines I already get (or news) but don't seek out reviews. I never ask friends what they're reading. I might get something based on an online suggestion - but mostly it's me and the bookshelf going 'hm.'
Posted by: Liz | Monday, September 18, 2006 at 09:47 AM
I'm a contrary consumer. Splashy store displays, Oprah's choices, the advertising campaign for "If All Seattle Read the Same Book...", etc. just make me turn up my nose and say, "I don't need them to tell me what I should read."
I do read reviews, though I don't pay much attention to the grade unless I know and trust the reviewer. Reviews just help me get a sense of what the book is about and how it meshes with my tastes. I also go by friends' recommendations, and I'm willing to try almost anything a favorite author says s/he loves to read.
Posted by: Susan Wilbanks | Monday, September 18, 2006 at 09:54 AM
Advertising hype generally turns me against the thing it is pushing, rather than towards it. I do not necessarily believe reviews, and deliberately ignore all cover 'art' (if I did not, I might never have read a romance in my life, since I loathe the great majority of fiction covers). I will listen to friends' recommendations, but know well that my tastes differ in many ways from those of even very close friends. (I need only say that Talpianna loves Tolkien...!)
No, one has to READ part of the book: it's the only way. My 'tasting' method requires the first page or two, a random couple of pages in the middle, and another couple of pages near the end. If the book passes that test, I'll buy it. The beginning alone is not enough for me, especially since it became so fashionable to have a lot of frenetic action at the very start. I dislike that, so I need to read bits further on to get a more balanced view.
Posted by: AgTigress | Monday, September 18, 2006 at 11:14 AM
If everyone's reading it I don't want to. I refuse to buy/read anything Oprah recommends.
I discovered Dan Brown with Digital Fortress in '96 and then Angels and Demons, so I read the DaVinci Code before the hype. I would never have picked it up after the hyping started.
I also don't trust author blurbs and I'll rarely read something a friend recomends.
For me reading is personal... I like what I like and I don't trust anyone else's opinion.
My husband is much worse than I am about reading "recommended books". It took 12 years to get him to read Terry Pratchett. (and I own them all, so they weren't hard to get). I tricked him into Pratchett by taking the "Guards, Guards" CD on vacation with us. He was trapped in the car and had to listen to it and he liked it.
But normally...
Posted by: Shannon | Monday, September 18, 2006 at 12:51 PM
Since my list of auto-buys in romance and mystery is quite long, I am very particular about the new authors I try. I pay no attention to promos or paper reviews or TV hosts recs. Sometimes I buy a book by an author whose on-line personality seems appealing. Sometimes I try a book based on a review by a particular on-line reviewer whose tastes I know are similar to mine. More often the new authors I try are recommended by real-life or on-line friends. Even then, I usually read the first few pages and the last few pages before I buy the book. For me, the ending is more important than the beginning.
Posted by: Wylene | Monday, September 18, 2006 at 01:47 PM
I'm prejudiced against hyped books because of so many disappointments. It started in high school with a best seller everyone insisted we had to read, so the English teacher put it on the reading list. Bad writing. Even then I could tell. I hated it. Later I tried another Hot Book of the Year or Month or whatever. More bad writing. I started seeing a pattern: quirky or sensational or "different" plot and cardboard characters and/or clumsy prose. So I quit paying attention. I read the authors I know I can count on. I try some new ones based on reviews, either because the review is by someone I respect or because the story sounds intriguing. I test books by reading a passage in the middle. And, yes, I will try something new my sister recommends.
Posted by: LorettaChase | Monday, September 18, 2006 at 03:46 PM
Hi All... there's only two things that will get me to part with my hard-earned cash -- the first few pages of the book and a WW's blurb on the cover.
And Susan/Sarah... I finished Duchess about a week ago and I am still speechless (or wordless) as to describe how awed the story left me. And not just the story but the book’s tone. It was... well I have no words yet. I sure hope it hits the NYT's best seller list. You deserve it!
--the littlest wenchling
Posted by: Nina P | Monday, September 18, 2006 at 05:38 PM
I'm another one of those contrary readers. I'd NEVER pick up something being pushed that hard (if it's so darn good, why does it need such hype?). And I won’t buy anything that Oprah recommends or that has a movie tie-in cover.
I mean, it took me being trapped on holiday in the middle of nowhere to get me to read Harry Potter (and now I'm freaken addicted, so I acknowledge that my knee-jerk NO isn’t always the correct response).
Posted by: Kalen Hughes | Tuesday, September 19, 2006 at 07:55 AM
See, I KNEW you all would be cussed individuals when it came to choosing book, and more power to you for it! :)
On the other hand, however, I just checked the Amazon sales number for the current rank of that big-push novel.
It's Number Four.
That's NUMBER FOUR out of, oh, half a billion or so.
Huh.
Posted by: shscott21 | Tuesday, September 19, 2006 at 08:12 AM
Yep, I'm like you, Susan/Miranda - do NOT tell me what to buy *g*. The more a book is hyped, the less likely I am to buy it. Especially if it's l-i-t-e-r-a-t-u-r-e. I buy based on author, setting, period and genre (sometimes I want a historical, sometimes a mystery and sometimes chick-lit).
Posted by: Teresa | Wednesday, September 20, 2006 at 02:22 PM
"I try a book based on a review by a particular on-line reviewer whose tastes I know are similar to mine."
Yep. There used to be one online reviewer whose tastes were so opposite to mine that if she hated the book, I'd trot right out and buy it . I think that's the thing you have to do with any reviewer--calibrate your tastes to his or hers and act accordingly.
"I test books by reading a passage in the middle."
Having been fried by one too many books with a great beginning that couldn't be sustained, I also read from the middle.
As for hyped books, if the book sounds interesting, and the excerpt is appealing, I'll check it out from the library. Sometimes that means waiting for a while, but that's okay--it's not like I don't have (literally) hundreds of books to read...
Posted by: Katy Cooper | Wednesday, September 20, 2006 at 03:50 PM