Anne here, bringing you the post on fake jewelry I promised you a few blogs ago.
For years I've read stories where the family jewels had been replaced with imitations, usually by some spendthrift chap or a secret gambler. And the dowager declares in sorrow, or outrage, or horror, or in confidence, depending on the plot, "Paste my dear, nothing but paste."
I don't know what I thought paste was. I took the word fairly literally, and imagined some kind of paste that when hardened, looked like pearls, or jewels of some kind. Somewhere in the unexamined bowels of my mind there was a connection between these fakes and the paste we used at school — a kind of glue, but we called called paste. (Photos above and below courtesy of The Three Graces)
I imagined layers of some clever and mysterious substance, built up until it had depth and brilliance or at least lustre. I was sure that in some versions, fish scales were used to achieve the latter effect — I must have read that somewhere, I expect in Georgette Heyer. Clearly, going by my fiction reading, there were grades of paste — some were good imitations and could fool all but an expert, others were visible at a glance.
But it wasn't until I was writing my most recent book that I actually thought to research it. (Yes, there are paste jewels in this story, but it's not a big part of the plot, so I'm not giving anything important away.) I don't know why I didn't look it up before — I even had a paste tiara in one of my books but it never occurred to me to research it before now.
So, let us start with faking pearls. Pearls have always been popular. Queen Elizabeth the first, the Virgin Queen, had a particular passion for them, not simply because they were pretty, but because they were also symbolic of purity. As you can see from this portrait, she wasn't subtle about getting her message across. Pearls galore.
In the early-mid 1600's, pearls blossomed in popularity throughout fashionable Europe, not simply worn as necklaces and other items of jewelry, but sewn onto clothing and even shoes as an adornment, and to be up there in the fashion stakes, you needed to wear masses of pearls. And the bigger the better.
But pearls were madly expensive — the art/science of cultured pearls was unknown until the 20th century, and pearls were both rare, and exotic, coming from far flung parts of the world. Only kings and queens and a few mega-rich could afford masses of real pearls, so the race was on to produce faux pearls that would fool everyone. Because one needed to appear richly dressed, even if one couldn't afford it—perhaps especially if one couldn't afford it — appearances, then as now, were crucial to social success.
In the 17th century, a man called Jaquin of Paris patented a method of faking pearls. He made tiny glass balls that were hollow inside, filled them with wax to strengthen them and give them the right kind of weight, then lacquered them with a compound made of ground-up iridescent fish scales. His method was so successful that Paris became the centre for the production of fake pearls for more than 200 years.
However, that's not paste. Even though these pearls were made of pasted-on fish scales, paste as a term for jewelry, has nothing to do with faking pearls. Simply speaking, paste jewelry is leaded glass cut and faceted to resemble gems or precious stones, like rubies, emeralds, sapphires, diamonds and the like. Even opals could be faked with this method.
Paste is not the only way of faking precious stones — techniques of enhancing the appearance of genuine stones have long been in place — dyeing, waxing or smoking lesser-quality stones to enhance their color, fusing stones together to make composite stones.
Paste is a compound of glass containing white lead oxide and potash. The mixture of lead and glass makes the compound highly reflective. These pieces are cut — the variety of shapes possible is much more varied than in real gemstones — then the back is coated with a metal coating that enhances the brilliance and sometimes a colored foil that creates the color, like the paste "emeralds" above. (Photo used with permission)
The eighteenth century marked the beginning of what has been called "The Age of Paste." Shoe buckles and hair adornments made of ornate paste, steel and tin were fashionable for many years. The shoes wore out but the buckles were removable. Even paste was quite expensive, so you didn't want to lose your buckles.
Jewelled buttons (of paste) were also fashionable. And of course paste jewels were used for all kinds of jewelry — necklaces, tiaras, brooches, bracelets — you name it. (Above left is a French comb, circa 1840; below paste buttons. Photos courtesy of The Three Graces)
Once again the centre of faking it with paste gems was Paris — and the finest producer was Georges Strass. In fact some people still call paste jewelry "Strass jewelry." As the industrial revolution took off, however, the production of fake jewelry spread to the UK, to London and Birmingham, where they used steel for the settings of marcasite and cameos, particularly Jasperware, which was produced by Wedgewood Potteries to look like ancient cameo glass. Cameos became all the rage after Napoleon wore a cameo decorated crown for his coronation.
Interestingly, much of this early paste jewelry has lasted intact longer than some of the genuine articles, which was broken up and the stones reset into more modern styles.
The demand for paste continued to increase into the nineteenth and twentieth century and still remains popular, today. I know I had huge fun choosing a variety of paste items to wear when I went to the Romance Writers of Australia costume party dripping with "diamonds" — which as we all know, are a girl's best friend — even many years on. ;)
So what about you — Do you have any paste jewelry? Can you recall a book that contains some reference to paste jewellery? Or tell us about your favorite piece of jewellery — antique, real or paste, or a sentimental favorite.










Anne,
I have quite a bit of paste inherited from my grandmothers and aunt. It's all still quite beautiful and though I don't go out to anything fancy, I do wear it when I can. I love to sparkle. My DH says I must have been a crow in another life ;o)
I do have a gorgeous set of natural pearls. Double strand, 30 inches with a huge diamond clasp and matching bracelet. That set stays in the safe most of the time, but I have worn it. There's nothing like pearls against the skin...
Posted by: theo | Wednesday, August 29, 2012 at 06:50 AM
Theo, my oldest sister has my mother's antique sparkles, but that's fine by me because I've amassed quite a bit of my own bling. I love it too.
Your pearls sound beautiful. I'm with you on the feeling of wearing them next to the skin — in fact I've read that you need to wear natural pearls frequently to maintain their lustre. Not sure if that's a myth, but I can see a good excuse when I need one.
Posted by: Anne Gracie | Wednesday, August 29, 2012 at 07:00 AM
Fabulous post, Anne, totally fascinating. Thank you! I know a bit about those pearl necklaces of the 17th century because pearls feature heavily in our portrait collection at Ashdown House. I knew nothing about paste jewellery though and found that really interesting.
As far as I know, none of the jewellery I've inherited is paste although I look forward to the day I take it to be valued and the antiques expert does their best imitation of one of those dowagers and says: "It's paste, my dear." I won't mind if it is - I love a bit of bling!
Posted by: Nicola Cornick | Wednesday, August 29, 2012 at 08:04 AM
How fascinating. I had no idea. Until I read your post, I would have said I didn't have any paste jewelry. Now, I have a lovely pair of pewter twined dragons with a red "jewel" between them, which I think is probably colored glass. I like paste, pretty without the stress of expensive. :-)
Posted by: Judy | Wednesday, August 29, 2012 at 08:17 AM
Very interesting post, Anne. I'm not big on jewellery, but I do have a favorite piece. It's the Claddagh ring my husband gave me for a birthday several years ago. The Claddagh ring is the traditional wedding ring from Galway, Ireland, and since I love everything Irish, this gift was very special to me. I even managed to work a Claddagh ring into my first novel (althoug mine is silver and the other one gold). I even named that series of book The Claddagh Series, for its motto of friendship, loyalty and love.
Posted by: Cynthia Owens | Wednesday, August 29, 2012 at 08:39 AM
Well, you learn something new everyday! I always wondered what exactly 'paste' meant, but just figured 'fake' and read on.
I have some costume jewelry from my grandmother that I remember playing with as a little girl, feeling fabulous! I have no little girls to give it to, but maybe one day I'll have a grand-daughter who will do the same thing as I.
Cynthia, I love the Claddagh symbol. My grandparent's wedding rings were claddaghs, and the story that accompanies the symbol is great too. It's everything marriage should be.
Posted by: Kestrel | Wednesday, August 29, 2012 at 02:04 PM
Anne, one should wear natural pearls against the skin often because the natural oils in our skin helps to keep the lustre of the pearls fresh somewhat moist. So your myth is correct. (I worked for great friends of mine who owned a jewelry store.)
And some paste is still collectible and very expensive! Any of you who have paste, don't discount what you have. Depending on the designer, you might have a small treasure trove.
Posted by: theo | Wednesday, August 29, 2012 at 02:21 PM
You are quite right, Anne, you did read about fake pearls in Heyer. It's in Black Sheep when Stacy Calverleigh has just met that winsome widow "Mrs. Clapham" and is wondering about her jewelry and whether it's real and expensive: "He recalled that she had been wearing large pearl drops in her ears, and round her throat a necklace of pearls which, if they were indeed pearls, must have cost the late Mr Clapham a pretty penny. But in these days one never knew: the most convincing pearls could be made out of glass and fish-scales. He had purchased one of these sham necklaces himself once, to gratify the lightskirt at that time living in his keeping and the sheen on those trumpery beads would have deceived anyone but a jeweller."
On a recent episode of Pawn Stars someone brought in a set of paste buttons of large snowflake/explosion/star design which he believed had belonged to Marie Antoinette, and Rick went into what paste is comprised of and how to tell paste from real. Alas for the seller, the detail on the crest stamped on the box indicated the buttons were post-Napoleon. The buttons themselves were quite pretty and one could wear them today, I think.
Posted by: Janice | Wednesday, August 29, 2012 at 04:17 PM
Nicola, I can't wait for my next trip to the UK, where I'm determined to go to Ashdown house and maybe get a personal tour. *g*
As for paste jewellery, it's a fascinating area of study. (she says veering between English/Australian spelling and US spelling)
I read that sometimes a client would commission a jeweller to make a real set of jewellery and also a paste set identical to the first. Security, I suppose.
Posted by: Anne Gracie | Wednesday, August 29, 2012 at 04:26 PM
Judy your pewter twined dragons sound gorgeous. I'm very fond of interesting pieces like that.
And paste is very collectable these days, especially antique paste.
Posted by: Anne Gracie | Wednesday, August 29, 2012 at 04:28 PM
Cynthia, I've always thought the Claddagh ring is a beautifully romantic thing. It's so simple, yet the message is so heartfelt. A lovely present from a thoughtful husband.
Posted by: Anne Gracie | Wednesday, August 29, 2012 at 04:30 PM
Kestrel, I was the same — just made a vague guess — the important thing was that it was fake — and read on. Now I've bought a book about faking all sorts of things and I can tell you, it's an eye-opener.
But hang onto that paste jewelry you inherited— it's probably already valuable now, and your granddaughter(s) to be will love it, I'm sure.
Posted by: Anne Gracie | Wednesday, August 29, 2012 at 04:33 PM
Thanks, Theo for that little bit of wisdom about keeping the lustre of pearls fresh. I pick up bits of knowledge and lore like fluff all the time and never know where I got the information from or how true it is.
And absolutely, don't discount the paste jewelry you own— most of the photos I used in the blog are from antique dealers (who very kindly gave me permission to use the photos) and those pretty sparkles are worth serious money. And a lot of the top fashion houses prefer paste now because you can cut glass in a greater variety of shapes and the actual craft work of the metal surrounding is the same as for genuine gems.
Posted by: Anne Gracie | Wednesday, August 29, 2012 at 04:37 PM
Janice, you're a gem, and not a paste one, either. It was indeed that book of Heyers that taught me about glass and fish-scale pearls. Thank you!
That's a very interesting story about Pawn Stars and the post-Napoleonic buttons. I read that apparently Napoleon's empire gave rise to a whole new resurgence of bling, as he and his family flaunted their new-found wealth. And as the new paste techniques gave such spectacular results, everyone was buying it.
Posted by: Anne Gracie | Wednesday, August 29, 2012 at 04:47 PM
What a fascinating post, Anne! I guess I had a rather amorphous idea of what constituted paste jewelry, but your post clarifies a great deal for me. I do have a number of lovely old pieces that belonged to my great aunt. She was very fond of broaches and often used them as hat pins as well.
I collect cameos, some genuine and some I am sure are completely fake, but lovely nonetheless. My Mom has a complete set of Wedgewood cameos - ring, earrings and necklace. My Dad bought them for her when we lived in England. I always wear them at least one evening at RWA's National Conference.
I love the idea of having one genuine set made and a paste set made as security. Very clever. And some of the paste jewelry I have seen quite puts some modern pieces to shame!
Posted by: LouisaCornell | Wednesday, August 29, 2012 at 05:58 PM
Louisa, I adore cameos and will look forward to seeing your set next time I'm at National. I also love the idea of hatpins, though you'd need a lot of thick and maybe curly hair, I suspect, and currently I have quite a short crop.
A bead lady I know makes the most gorgeous necklaces combining woven beads with antique bling — really stunning to look at.
Posted by: Anne Gracie | Wednesday, August 29, 2012 at 06:09 PM
Fascinating post, Anne. I always thought paste was built up of a sort of paste and would be rubbery to the touch.
I have had a significant wedding anniversary worthy of a "good" ring, but have spotted a paste one that I think I like better.
I have now found out I love paste jewellery. But now I'm wondering what the difference is between it and costume jewellery?
Alison
Posted by: Alison Reynolds | Wednesday, August 29, 2012 at 07:00 PM
Alison, congratulations on your significant wedding anniversary.
As for the difference between paste jewellery and costume jewellery, I don't think there is any. Two terms for the same thing with 'paste' being the old fashioned term and 'costume' being the more modern one.
Posted by: Anne Gracie | Wednesday, August 29, 2012 at 07:05 PM
OK, I looked it up and now I'd say 'costume jewellery' is more of a general term for a range of different fakes, whereas 'paste' is a specific kind of fake.
From wikipedia: "Costume jewelry came into being in the 1930s as a cheap, disposable accessory meant to be worn with a specific outfit. It was intended to be fashionable for a short period of time, outdate itself, and then be repurchased to fit with a new outfit or new fashion style. Its main use is in fashion, as opposed to "real" (fine) jewelry which may be regarded primarily as collectibles, keepsakes, or investments. Costume jewelry is made of less valuable materials including base metals, glass, plastic, and synthetic stones; in place of more valuable materials such as precious metals and gems."
Posted by: Anne Gracie | Wednesday, August 29, 2012 at 07:12 PM
Great blog Anne. I have quite a collection of unset paste stones dating from the late 1800s into the 1900s. My father was a jeweller and he collected them when he first went into business in about 1930. Every now and then I look at them and think "wow - if only they were real!" I also have some Victorian jewellery containing paste stones. It is very pretty.
Theo, I also remember my father telling me to wear pearls next to the skin, otherwise they would eventually die.
Posted by: Jenny Reid | Wednesday, August 29, 2012 at 10:37 PM
Great post, Anne. Yes, paste jewellery so often gets mentioned in the way you noted. But I always love it when a heroine - usually impoverished or lower class - has a paste brooch or jewel they treasure above everything either because of who it belonged to or because it is the prettiest thing they've ever owned.
Pearl wearers, just be careful the skin you're wearing those natural pearls against hasn't been sprayed with perfume. Nothing is more harmful to a pearl.
Posted by: Louise Reynolds | Wednesday, August 29, 2012 at 11:46 PM
Not about paste, but about the politics of fakery - part of a paragraph from Colette's Gigi that I've loved for years:
"... they knew how to converse on scandalous topics traditional and recondite. From the age of twelve, Gigi had known that Madame Otero's string of large black pearls were 'dipped' - that is to say, artificially tinted - while the three rows of her matchlessly graded pearl necklace were 'worth a king's ransom'; that Madame de Pougy's seven rows lacked 'life'; that Eugenie Fougeres famous diamond bolero was quite worthless..."
Posted by: Shannon McEwan | Wednesday, August 29, 2012 at 11:56 PM
My favorite piece of jewlery is a plain thick gold band that belonged to my grandmother's mother. She was a concert pianist who died vy young trying to give birth to her third child. Her husband later remarried, and gave the gold band to his daughter, my grandmother, with the engraving "from Papa 1899".
Posted by: Betty Hamilton | Thursday, August 30, 2012 at 04:34 AM
But why is it called "paste"?
Posted by: Jane O | Thursday, August 30, 2012 at 05:25 AM
Jenny what an interesting collection from your father. It sounds really gorgeous, and as for being real — antique paste is pretty fancy these days.
Some Victorian era jewellery is lovely, I agree, though some is also a bit over-the-top for me.
Posted by: Anne Gracie | Thursday, August 30, 2012 at 05:29 AM
Thanks for that little nugget of info re pearls and perfume, Louise. I didn't know that, but I rarely wear perfume anyway, so probably haven't killed any pearls lately.
I also like it when a heroine loves something for its sentimental value, rather than its monetary value. My princess heroine loved her paste tiara because it was her mothers.
Posted by: Anne Gracie | Thursday, August 30, 2012 at 05:32 AM
Shannon, that quote from Gigi was gorgeous, thank you — quite delicious. It's made me want to read it again.
Betty what a lovely story to go with that ring. I love hearing about items that have a story attached to them. Thank you for sharing it.
Posted by: Anne Gracie | Thursday, August 30, 2012 at 05:39 AM
Jane O, I haven't really come across a good explanation of why it's called paste, I'm afraid. The origin of the term seems to be unknown. Some have suggested it's from the Italian word 'pasta' because it's soft and easily shaped. This seems unlikely to me. Glass and foil isn't exactly soft.
Perhaps it's related to this meaning (from the OED) "6. [Perhaps an alteration of Middle French passe part of a woman's headdress shielding the face (a1486; French passe).] An ornamental headdress made from pasteboard and worn by women. Now hist. and rare."
Posted by: Anne Gracie | Thursday, August 30, 2012 at 05:46 AM
Louise, thanks for reminding me of the perfume and pearls. I had forgotten.
Posted by: Jenny Reid | Thursday, August 30, 2012 at 07:06 PM
Don't know if this is an urban legend, but I heard that Elizabeth Taylor was not allowed to wear the real "Burton diamond" but had a copy made while the original lived in a vault.
Posted by: Artemisia | Thursday, August 30, 2012 at 09:02 PM
When my great-grandmother was dying she gave her Sunday necklace to my grandma. Her brother demanded that she return "my mother's pearls" to him. She said "what pearls?" He said "the ones she wore every Sunday." She said "Frank, she bought them in Murphy's 5&10." I have them here in the original box and for fake 5&10 pearls they have held up very well. I don't dare touch them though. I'm afraid they will break.
Posted by: Artemisia | Thursday, August 30, 2012 at 09:15 PM
My favorite book involving paste jewels is Heyer's False Colours. A large part of the plot revolves around an attempt to retrieve a brooch that turns out to be real rather than paste.
Posted by: Linda S | Thursday, August 30, 2012 at 11:41 PM
Love both of those stories, Artemisia — it kind of makes security sense that Liz didn't wear the real thing, but then, really — what's the point?
And I love that your great-grandmother loved her Sunday pearls so much. And that your great-uncle thought they must be valuable. Mind you, valuable or not, the gift meant it was your grandma's anyway. My nan had some cheap pearls, and all the lustre wore off like peeling nail polish. We kids used to play with them.
Posted by: Anne Gracie | Friday, August 31, 2012 at 01:13 AM
Linda, are you sure it's False Colours? I keep trying to recall a brooch in False Colours and can't think of one.
But if you mean a scene involving a card game, a poker and later on, "Pom's great-aunt's brooch" *G* it's in the Convenient Marriage. I love that scene. And the book.
Posted by: Anne Gracie | Friday, August 31, 2012 at 01:17 AM
Anne,
Thanks so much for sharing such fascinating information. I always wondered about 'paste' but I'd never researched it. And loved the discussion about pearls and paste.
Can I please squeeze into your suitcase when you visit Nicola at Ashdown House??
Suzi
Posted by: Suzi Love | Friday, August 31, 2012 at 06:59 PM
Anne, you sent me running to my bookshelves to check. In False Colours Evelyn, the older twin, goes to Brighton to retrieve a brooch of his mother's, lost in a card game. He has a road accident and misses his engagement party. His twin, Kit, stands in for him, and complications ensue. The brooch is thought to be paste which is why the twins' mother is so anxious to get it back before her card opponent finds out. A paste brooch wouldn't have been worth as much money as the gambling debt!
I had forgotten the brooch in The Convenient Marriage, but I love that book, too!
Posted by: Linda S | Friday, August 31, 2012 at 08:17 PM
Linda, I'd completely forgotten that part of the story. All I remembered is Evelyn's accident and him waking up to an angel looking down at him. Thanks so much for explaining it.
Clearly I need to read it again. Oh, dear what a hardship. *g*
Posted by: Anne Gracie | Friday, August 31, 2012 at 08:35 PM
Anne again. Lyn just sent me this explanation of the origin of the term "paste"
She said: Reading an article in The Economist free iPad magazine Intelligent Life, Nov/Dec 2012 issue is this explanation.
"In the 18th century an Alsatian jeweler called Georg Strass began experimenting with the recipe for glass, mixing silica with high levels of lead oxide and additives such as potassium in a wet "paste" before firing.
The results were unusually hard and clear, and could be cut, polished and backed with metal foil like real diamonds, at the time themselves backed with foil in an attempt to increase their glitter. But Strass's paste was more malleable than diamond, his gems could be bigger, and cut to any shape, so they could be set very closely together."
Thanks you so much for that, Lyn.
Posted by: Anne Gracie | Friday, November 16, 2012 at 07:45 PM