Joanna here.
One of the minor disappointments of life is that there are no croissants in the Regency. My characters can enjoy flaky rolls, buns, sliced bread, tarts and all sorts of pastries for breakfast, but croissants didn't arrive in Paris till the late 1830s. They're as anachronistic on the Regency table as cornflakes.
Regency folks can chow down on brioche though. We got brioche.
Brioche is a light yeast bread, eggy and somewhat sweet -- though the recipes tell us it was less sweet in 1800 than it is nowadays -- frequently carrying a nice surprise of nuts or raisins. It was a veritable breakfast cliché in Paris in the Eighteenth Century. Brioche would have been comfortable and familiar on any wealthy English breakfast table, those being the ones influenced by the French way of cooking. By 1820, brioche was so common in England it was standard in cookbooks.
Which brings us to the question, how did a cook in a London or Paris household knead up a brioche for the gentility upstairs?
Carl Sagan said, "If you want to make an apple pie, you must first invent the universe." Somewhat less ambitiously, if we wish to set brioche before our Regency lady and gentleman, we must invent some Regency cookery.
We start the universe with hydrogen.
We start the brioche with flour, of which there were many kinds. 'Grist' was the most ordinary sort, flour with only the bran removed, used for making common bread. But our urban household buys their day-to-day bread from a bakery. They keep only fine white flour in the house for cakes and pastries and special puddings.
Flour would have been delivered to the house in a big barrel. In fact, a 'flour barrel' was a standard measure that held fourteen stone or just shy of 200 pounds, (ninety kilos,) of flour. That would be the size of forty modern bags of flour, stacked. That would be a bit of a tight fit in my kitchen.
Our Regency cook -- she's a formidable woman wearing a big white apron with the bib pinned up high on the shoulders -- is monarch of a substantial domain,
including some extensive food storage in the pantry, which is where they roll that flour barrel. When she sets out to make brioche, she sends some hapless underling -- the kitchenmaid -- to pop up the lid of the barrel and scoop out an earthenware bowl of flour.
Our flour is sifted through a round sieve at this point to remove any ambitious wildlife that might have found a way in.
Then -- Take four pounds of very dry flour. Lay the flour on the table after you have sifted it, says an 1828 recipe.
The cook would take part of that flour to mix up a 'sponge' of flour, water and a dollop of yeast from her yeast-on-go supply she has back in the pantry. She'd cover the bowl of sponge and set it to keep warm next to the fire. This gives the yeast a kickstart and makes sure it's working.
Cook keeps her own little farm of yeast going, stored in a jug on a cool shelf in the pantry, covered with a cloth. She might stick a quill through the cloth to let gases escape.
Here's how she makes yeast:
Mix two quarts of soft water with wheat flour, to the consistence of thick gruel, or soft hasty pudding; boil it gently for half an hour, and when almost cold, stir into it half a pound of sugar, and four spoonfuls of good yeast. Put it into a large jug, or earthen vessel, with a narrow top, and place it before the fire, so that it may, by a moderate heat, ferment. The fermentation will throw up a thin liquor, which pour off and throw away; the remainder keep for use in a cool place in a bottle, or jug tied over.
The water our Cook uses in Mayfair comes from twenty miles away in Hertfordshire by way of a reservoir in Islington. From there, it travels in iron pipes to the west of London.
Our cook has set the sponge aside to do its frothing while she performs other useful and interesting culinary tasks. After an hour or so she comes back and sets herself up at the big working table. All the ingredients are at hand. Flour. Eggs. A bit of salt. A bit of sugar. Raisins. The yeast is in its bowl, all sprightly and blowing off bubbles in the sponge. We're ready.
A period recipe says: Make a great hole in the flour, put four small pinches of salt on as many different places, with a good pinch of sugar to correct the bitter taste of the yeast, and a little water to melt the salt. Then take two pounds of butter, which you break into small pieces with your hand, and put in the middle of the flour: next break the eggs, and smell them successively to ascertain if they are good: mix the whole well together.
On to the sugar.
I always wondered, in a desultory manner, why 'sugar loaf' mountains don't look like loaves.
We buy bags of granular, free-running sugar. We pay extra for hard sugar formed into cubes.
Our Regency cook, on the other hand, just naturally expected sugar to come in a rock-hard cone. To get pouring sugar she had to chip or saw pieces off the cone, pound them into submission and grind them up fine in a mortar and pestle.
Grind, grind. More work for the kitchenmaid.
This here is a 'sugar nipper', not a Medieval torture instrument. They use sugar nippers to nip off handy-sized bits for putting in tea. 'One lump or two' was the result of this artistic handwork.
Can you see a fussy Grande Dame looking over the sugar bowl and trying to decide whether the sugar lumps are running kinda puny before she commits herself to how many she wants?
Milk was brought to the kitchen door at the crack of dawn by clear-complexioned and buxom -- buxom means having big breasts, but it's a really polite way to point this out -- milkmaids. They carry a pair of cans suspended from a yoke over their shoulders and dole out a helping into the kitchen jug, using various measuring dippers. Cream was sold separately from the milk.The cook would strain the milk one last time before using it.
Our cook buys her butter in the open air markets of the city when she's going from booth to booth, comparing freshness of all those lettuces and carrots. She probably goes to a farmer's wife she knows whose butter costs a little more and whose product is superior. This would be butter that was never let go rancid and then 'refreshed' by kneading it through many washes of water.
Mistress Farm Wife molds her butter into fancy shapes using a wood butter mold. The top comes out stamped with the unique design that tells the knowledgeable what farm the butter came from.
The cook might buy her eggs right from the same market.
Talking about eggs . . .
I had this mistaken assumption that brown-shelled eggs were traditional, old-fashioned eggs and white eggs were sorta modern. I guess I assumed they came up with white eggs in the Fifties to be hygienic
and streamlined.
Not so much. If you go searching back through the visual record of the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries, all the eggs are white. Yup. White eggs everywhere.
Flour, water, yeast, salt, sugar, eggs. At this point, much kneading is proceeding.
The final ingredient this morning is raisins, because this is a somewhat festive brioche, a gay and debonair brioche to cheer everyone up.
Before the mid-Nineteenth Century, just about all grapes had seeds in them. Recipes call for 'stoned raisins' which means they'd had the seeds removed, not that the raisins were inebriated. To get the seeds out, you'd cut each raisin open with a small knife or split them apart with fingers and pop the seeds out, a process that must have been tedious in the extreme.
One kind of naturally seedless grape of the time is the small, dark, sweet raisin, grown in Greece and exported all over Europe. They're called currants, after Corinth in Greece.
These currants are grapes, though, and not to be confused with the 'black currants' that grow on a bush and are related to gooseberries.
Why they decided to call two entirely different and unrelated fruits the same word I cannot imagine. It's not as if we are short of words.
I mean, sometime you look at the language and just wonder, 'why?'
Raisins come to the household still on the vine, as it were. They're dried in the sun as bunches and sold attached to the twigs and branches, from which they must be removed before they are washed and rolled in flour and kneaded into the dough.
We're at the finish line. Our brioche dough makes a firm sphere. Cook adds one fanciful flourish. A small ball of dough is pressed into the very top to make that cap that is the traditional Brioche experience.
The brioche is tied into a paper and ready to bake. Later on, in Victorian times, they'll get around to using distinctive, fluted baking dishes. Now it's paper cookery.
And so, to the oven.
creative commons photocredits starter sponge chatirygirl, brioche dessertfirst, sugar cone felix.
When Marie Antoinette was not saying, 'let them eat cake' --
which she didn't say because the phrase was around before poor Marie Antoinette arrived in France --
what she didn't say was, 'Let them eat brioche.'
Which I will now leave my Regency ladies and gentlemen to get down to.
Thinking back, I find I have set my characters down to eat breakfast in all three books. Annique has a bowl of milky coffee and a flaky pastry in The SPYMASTER'S LADY. Jessamyn is offered toast and tea in MY LORD AND SPYMASTER. And Maggie toys with surprisingly good coffee and a slice of bread at the café in THE FORBIDDEN ROSE.
What does a hero eat for breakfast? (Villains. Right. I set myself up for that.)
No, really. Roarke and Eve just finished French Toast for breakfast. When you picture a heroic character just rolling out of bed, what does he have for breakfast?










Wonderful post, Joanna. I can't wait for breakfast. You've made me think of the breakfasts I had in Paris many years ago. I'm not all that fond of croissants, so my choice was usually a fresh-baked chunk of baguette, sliced in half and spread with butter and/or apricot jam. It was washed down with coffee, which was served in two pots, one of black strong coffee and the other containing hot milk. Heaven. Every now and then I still treat myself to a "Parisian breakfast."
As for the "breakfast of heroes" my guys usually go for protein — bacon, eggs, ham, even roast beef or steak— and even though it was common for men to to wash their breakfast down with ale in those days, I usually serve my heroes coffee, because I don't want my headers to think they were alcoholics, drinking ale at breakfast.
Posted by: Anne Gracie | Friday, July 09, 2010 at 05:29 AM
Joanna, great post. Brought back some great memories for me of my grandmother baking bread - she was blind, but she unerringly made the best bread I'd ever tasted. To this day, I still remember her at the old wooden table in her house, kneading the bread. And after she died, I was given an old wooden butter mold that had belonged to my great-grandmother.
As for the breakfast of heroes, mine are usually Irish, so they'd be eating soda bread or Colcannon (potatoes mixed with cream and wild leeks) with tea. I actually had the opportunity to taste Colcannon when I was in Ireland last year, and it's delicious!
Posted by: Cynthia Owens | Friday, July 09, 2010 at 05:43 AM
How very interesting! It's details like these that make our understanding of the times greater and therefore the reading even more pleasurable.
Than you so much for sharing Joanna!
Posted by: Kim Colby | Friday, July 09, 2010 at 05:46 AM
Oh, all this food sounds wonderful! I want some of each--and a cook to make them, because I would starve if I had to cook for myself. Good thing hubby is a good cook. (I love you, dear).
Posted by: Linda Banche | Friday, July 09, 2010 at 06:29 AM
Hi Annie --
I have to say, the thought of ale for breakfast sets my teeth on edge. Couldn't face it, myself.
(I have always thought much of European history can be explained by the theory that everyone went around mildly buzzed all the time.)
Protein. Yes. Definitely.
Posted by: Joanna Bourne | Friday, July 09, 2010 at 08:13 AM
Hi Cynthia Owens,
Butter molds seem to come in a couple three sorts.
Some English examples were used by the dairy owners to mark their product. This could be a mold the butter went into or a stamp to tap down on top.
Some molds were finely made, meant to decorate butter that would be served 'upstairs'. There's one in the inventory of a cabinetmaker, for instance.
Then there's a whole folk art tradition in America, influenced by German immigrants. I just love these. Charming and vibrant art.
You're fortunate to have one that's been in your family so long.
Fascinating about the Irish Breakfasts. And Irish soda bread. Yum yum. I never make this as well as they do in Ireland.
Posted by: Joanna Bourne | Friday, July 09, 2010 at 08:27 AM
Hi Kim Colby --
I love understanding the details of everyday life.
This stuff is surprisingly hard to find out about, though. Nobody puts this in their period journal or mentions it in a letter.
I guess it makes sense. I mean, how many times do we sit down and write the details of how to change a lightbulb?
Posted by: Joanna Bourne | Friday, July 09, 2010 at 08:32 AM
Hi Linda Banche --
It's getting to be where the husband is the 'house cook' very often, I think. I love this flexibility.
Posted by: Joanna Bourne | Friday, July 09, 2010 at 08:44 AM
Fabulous post! Thanks for all the great info!
And, dang, why do I have nothing but pre-fab wheat bread in the house??
Posted by: Elisa | Friday, July 09, 2010 at 09:06 AM
Hi Elisa --
Same with me. I feel stirred to virtuous bread-making by this post.
But it may be only muffins. I make a very empowering cranberry-walnut muffin.
Posted by: Joanna Bourne | Friday, July 09, 2010 at 09:13 AM
Lovely post, but now I'm hungry. Breakfast -- whether brioche, French toast (and why French, I wonder), or Cheerios plus banana -- is my favorite meal of the day. I think the reason Cook added raisins is because the hero (the youngest son in the household) loves raisins and Cook has always had a soft spot for him (as does our heroine, perfect for him in every way except for her dislike of raisins).
I noticed that the measurements of the dry ingredients in the recipes were often in weights. This is still the way it's done in Europe, but in the US we tend to measure by volume, which, as I understand it, is more variable and therefore less accurate. I wouldn't necessarily know from personal experience, as my husband, like Linda's, does all the cooking (in return, I clean).
Posted by: Susan/DC | Friday, July 09, 2010 at 10:04 AM
Hi Susan/DC --
The French, being intransigent, don't call it French Toast. THEY call it 'lost bread',
which is evocative, but also one of those things that make you wonder, 'why'?
Who lost the bread? Who found it? How did it get into an eggs/milk/skillet situation?
The dynamic of a hero who likes raisins and a heroine who loathes them is, I believe, what writerly types would call an external conflict. The resolution of this turmoil eludes me, I'm afraid.
Perhaps they will construct a long happy future where breakfast tables hold both brioche and wheaten toast.
Posted by: Joanna Bourne | Friday, July 09, 2010 at 10:56 AM
That made me* hungary. Wouldn't mind a brioche right now.
Remember way, way back going to my great Aunt's and operating a churn to get butter...up, down, up, down forever. She used a large "butter crock" to hold the result from churning. I'd get a glass of buttermilk.
Good.
Posted by: Louis | Friday, July 09, 2010 at 12:25 PM
Hi Louis --
You have actually seen and operated a butter churn!
Just wow. Wow.
There must have been 1800-ish butter crocks, but I have not yet located a picture of one. Always something that eludes us.
They make nifty two-piece ceramic 'French butter keepers' or 'French butter bells', but the design seems to date only to the late Nineteenth Century. Too bad, really.
Posted by: Joanna Bourne | Friday, July 09, 2010 at 12:53 PM
Don't know what kind of chickens were around during the Regency, but can tell you the vast majority of chicken breeds lay brown eggs. We've raised many different breeds, and only the white Leghorns lay white eggs. We get brown, blue and green eggs currently. It is also false that these colors taste any different. The taste and texture are better because of freshness, not shell color.
Posted by: LILinda | Friday, July 09, 2010 at 04:06 PM
Re egg color, I believe the color related directly to the color of the hen -- white hens pretty much ay white eggs and colored hens lay brown eggs. I believe the "brown eggs is better" notion came when an occasional brown eggs came from white hens, which made it unusual. We kept chickens when I was a kid and whenever we found a brown egg it was treated as a reward. Similarly a double yolker was a surprise treat.
I think Enid Blyton used to wax lyrical about brown eggs, too, which added to the impression in my child's brain.
There was a bit of an outcry here last Orthodox Easter as the folk who traditionally dye eggs for Easter are finding it harder and harder to find white eggs, and the brown color dulls the bright dyes they use.
Re the butter crocks, I'm guessing, but it might be that in the UK the weather wasn't warm enough for melting to be a problem, so the butter kept in slabs quite well, and the butter was salted to preserve it. They might have needed a different system in warmer climes. Unsalted butter was and is, I think, much more prevalent in European countries.
And one last piece of trivia — when I was staying in North Wales (Caernarfon) many years ago, where central heating was not standard, I was intrigued that my hostess placed the butter crock next to the hearth every night, so that it would be soft enough in the morning to spread on toast. They never put butter in the fridge, whereas we in hotter climes have to.
Posted by: Anne Gracie | Friday, July 09, 2010 at 05:03 PM
Flour sifting - random annoyance or kitchen menace.
http://kitchensavvy.typepad.com/journal/2005/07/sifting_flour.html
Lots of reasons to sift flour.
Your cook might indeed sift her flour to remove any critters, but most likely she is in fact going to some lengths to prevent her supplies from becoming weavil (or mouse) infested in the first place.
Like tainted meat, it would happen, but is not the normal or expected state of affairs.
A barrel of flour sounds like a lot, but a good-sized household would tear through it pretty quickly.
What the cook is sifting her flour for is to aerate it in order to produce a lighter final product.
Sift the stuff about twice and you've got separated all the tiny grains of flour and incorporated a lot of air.
It just handles differently than compacted flour, even if you are going to be kneading it for a while.
Posted by: laura | Friday, July 09, 2010 at 05:24 PM
Hi LI Linda --
I admit myself puzzled that only white eggs show up in all these European paintings. I see chickens sometimes in the paintings, but I don't know what breed they are.
There seem to have been lots of old local breeds we don't see any more. They had names like Appenzeller, Sabelpoot, Campine, Crevecoeur, Dorking, (If you raised these you could speak familiarly of all the dorks out in the yard,)Hamburgh, Houdan, Polish, Spanish White-face, and -- my favorite -- a French breed dating to before 1660. La Fleche
Posted by: Joanna Bourne | Friday, July 09, 2010 at 05:54 PM
Hi Anne --
I shared household with a young Swedish woman when I first lived in London. The fridge was tiny and she used to drive me mad, leaving the milk and butter outside on the windowsill to keep.
So weird.
On the other hand, London was not precisely sultry. I used to grow moss on the shady side of the car.
Posted by: Joanna Bourne | Friday, July 09, 2010 at 06:01 PM
Hi Laura --
>>>Flour sifting - random annoyance or kitchen menace.<<<
A question for the ages. Yes indeed.
The cook's sifter would have been a hoop of wood with a mesh of cloth or horsehair or fine wire. I couldn't find a public domaine picture of one, though.
See a modern reproduction at
http://www.beaverbuckets.com/Flour%20Sifter.htm
Posted by: Joanna Bourne | Friday, July 09, 2010 at 06:13 PM
Hi Jo. That was a most excellent post, and I learned a thing or two (okay, a lot more than that). Thanks for alerting us over at the forum. Miss you!
Posted by: Lori Benton | Friday, July 09, 2010 at 10:13 PM
Fascinating post. I love information about food almost as much as I love food.
Posted by: Jane O | Saturday, July 10, 2010 at 05:53 AM
I remember that my great Aunt also used a "butter press"...to squeeze out the last drop of milk. The result was a "brick" of butter.
Posted by: Louis | Saturday, July 10, 2010 at 11:31 AM
Hi Lori --
(waves madly)
I'm always fascinated by the ways technology shapes society.
Look at water delivery. London has good public pipes. Paris, not so much.
Paris had public baths in this period. Baths that were stuffily respectable. Inexpensive ones and fancy ones. Some that were the equivalent of a modern 'Day Spa'.
London didn't, really.
Posted by: Joanna Bourne | Saturday, July 10, 2010 at 01:37 PM
Hi Jane --
What impresses me is how very many parameters there are for something as simple as 'flour'.
Posted by: Joanna Bourne | Saturday, July 10, 2010 at 01:41 PM
Hi Louis --
And, thus, buttermilk.
I think ordinary country people in our period would have drunk buttermilk and well-skimmed milk.
The high-value and relatively transportable products, the cream, butter, cheese and clotted cream would be sent to market.
One recorder of the time says Londoners used only a drop or two of cream in their tea. Barely enough to change the color. In the morning, when the milkmaid came by, a household would buy an amount of cream 'equal to a hen's egg in size'
Posted by: Joanna Bourne | Saturday, July 10, 2010 at 01:52 PM
Hi Anne --
In re keeping butter cool.
I'm reminded of Elizabeth Goudge, The Little White Horse. In that book, butter was kept cool in a niche in the brick wall of the well, just within reach.
Posted by: Joanna Bourne | Saturday, July 10, 2010 at 01:59 PM
Sherrie, here. I'm such a foodie, so of course, I loved this post, Joanna! And breads are right up there at the top of my list of favorite foods. I do love brioches, but unless I go to a bakery, I don't see much of them available in my neck of the woods.
After reading your post, I was all fired up to go make bread, but it's far too hot to bake in a traditional oven, so I'll be heading to the kitchen shortly to make bread with the bread machine--a modern marvel that I kiss frequently and use just as frequently. I would dearly love to take a Regency cook and plop her into a modern American kitchen, then fix a meal for her using all the modern gadgets which would have made her life so much easier. I'll bet she'd be speechless.
OTOH, sometimes all the modern conveniences in the world can't compete with a cook who has "the touch." My Mom had it, and she passed it on to me and my brother and sister. Oddly, each has our own specialty--my brother is a whiz with pastas, my sister is the pastry queen, and I rule over the kingdom of casseroles and desserts. I can see why wealthy households in the Regency may have had specialty cooks--one who did meats and such, and a pastry chef who concocted towering confections.
Now I'm beastly hungry! I may have to brave the heat and whip up a casserole. Or wait! I'll use another modern convenience: my crock pot.
Posted by: Sherrie Holmes | Saturday, July 10, 2010 at 04:10 PM
Wonderful post Jo! I love learning about history this way. Someday I'll be brave enough to keep a yeast starter in my kitchen. I've made bread from a starter mix a friend gave me, but not yet completely from scratch. And now I'm sooo hungry...
:-)
Deniz
-- win a copy of The Forbidden Rose at http://www.thegirdleofmelian.blogspot.com
Posted by: deniz | Saturday, July 10, 2010 at 05:48 PM
Hi Sherrie --
I wonder if the Regency cook would approve of our ingredients. Would she find the eggs undistinguished, the butter oddly full of water, the flour lacking that 'nutty flavor' Parisian bakers of the time demanded?
I'll bet she'd love the oven though. The great quest of the Regency cook was a reliable oven temperature. That's why you start seeing soufflés in cookbooks after 1800, when stove technology was improving.
And what a Regency cook would make of a microwave oven . . .
I've never owned a bread machine. I keep thinking I should try one out.
Posted by: Joanna Bourne | Saturday, July 10, 2010 at 06:44 PM
Hi Deniz --
Every once in a while I get het up with a desire to take up the business of sourdough starter.
I sit down for a while and it goes away.
Posted by: Joanna Bourne | Saturday, July 10, 2010 at 06:47 PM
What a wonderful post. I am now craving brioche and a French Breakfast. I am imagining myself at Angelina's or Laduree right now!
The sourdough starter made me think of the Little House books by Laura Ingalls Wilder. In one of the later ones, maybe "Little Town on The Prarie" Laura or maybe Ma explains to company (and the reader) how they make a sourdough starter from scratch so they always have some in the cupboard to work from. I was facinated by this as a child.
Your article kept me similarly spellbound. Anyone can make a fight scene interesting, but to facinate with flour and raisins is quite a talent!
Thanks for the lovely read,
Christine
Posted by: Christine | Saturday, July 10, 2010 at 07:16 PM
Great post, Joanna!
Re: "When you picture a heroic character just rolling out of bed, what does he have for breakfast?" I'm gonna guess he's already had breakfast -- a.k.a. the heroine. ;-)
But you've got me hungry for fresh homemade bread, which I soon plan to remedy, sans bread-machine. There's nothing like plunging kneading hands in into a warm four/water mixture and watching it come up dough.
Posted by: NinaP | Sunday, July 11, 2010 at 09:55 AM
Hi Christine --
That's because baking is exciting business. And, unlike a good Romance book, you never know how it's going to turn out in the end. *g*
Posted by: Joanna Bourne | Sunday, July 11, 2010 at 10:18 AM
Hi NinaP --
I too ended up making bread last night. Cheese muffins.
This is part of a long-term determination to make cheese muffins that mimic those served by one of the big chain restaurants.
Not so much luck yet. I persevere.
Posted by: Joanna Bourne | Sunday, July 11, 2010 at 10:26 AM
Hm. I always thought Pain Perdue meant the bread was lost because it was stale, and this is how you recover it.
The entire process of feeding a household seems so much more timeconsuming and complex back then. I think poor households, with no maids, tended to do one pot cooking. And you can see why porridge was the common breakfast food rather than bread, and bread was for richer households.
Great post!
Posted by: Debbie | Sunday, July 11, 2010 at 11:08 AM
Hi Debbie --
Yes, indeed. You're quite right. The bread is 'lost' as in being dry, stale bread that would otherwise be wasted but can instead become incredibly yummy breakfast if you just dunk it in eggs and milk.
Would that other problems were so simply solved.
How stale? Probably not so much. Many places, even now, you buy your bread fresh every day. Yesterday's bread goes to the chickens.
Or becomes French Toast or crutons or sop for the soup.
Now, in the Regency time frame, in England proper and in France, bread was pretty much the basic food of the people.
It wasn't baked at home, though, and thus didn't compete with meals that were. About everywhere possible, bread came from the baker.
The baker's advantage was not just in buying bulk supplies. It was in the economics of maintaining and fueling a single huge oven versus many small ones. In fact, the 'oven advantage' was such that folks brought their roasts and casseroles to the baker. They pay a small fee to cook dinner communally in his oven.
Posted by: Joanna Bourne | Sunday, July 11, 2010 at 12:13 PM
Joanna, what a fun post! Tracing the origins of the ingredients makes the final product that much more of an achievement, than simply running off to the store.
When I read GIRL WITH THE PEARL EARRING, I realized that the ale that most people drank (especially women and older children) at breakfast was much watered down than normal strength.
Anne, yes, heh. Enid Blyton waxed lyrical about brown eggs and in her farm books about thick-sliced brown bread.
Posted by: Keira Soleore | Sunday, July 11, 2010 at 04:02 PM
Hi Keira --
I didn't know that about the watered ale.
So cool.
I know folks drank watered wine. It's what my sisters and I drank when we were in Europe. I think I have Annique in SPYMASTER'S LADY mention it as well.
This bit about the ale kinda puts the, 'Folks drank beer and wine because the water supply was unreliable,' idea in its place.
Seems to me folks drank ale, beer and wine 'cause they hadn't invented Mountain Dew and Coke.
Srlsy.
Posted by: Joanna Bourne | Monday, July 12, 2010 at 10:16 AM
I have vivid memories of Granny Brown on the porch, churning butter. This would have been in the 1950s in Kentucky. I believe the churn was homemade. It was about 18 inches high, wider at the base. The top was an uneven round of wood with a hole in the center for the paddle. She kept a cow, so the milk and cream would have been very fresh. I think she formed the butter into a mound, but I don't know if she salted it. Also can't remember how it was stored.
Posted by: Gemma McLuckie | Tuesday, July 13, 2010 at 07:06 PM
We're the last generation, I guess, who will even have SEEN much of this stuff.
On the one hand, I'm sorry to see a whole way of life disappear.
On the other, I'm very glad I don't have to churn my own butter or put clothes through a mangle or tiptoe out in the cool morning air to slop the hogs, who must be very insulted by the notion of eating 'slops' anyway.
Oh. And milking cows. I'm glad I don't have to milk Bossy. (It is amazing how generations of milkmaids have named their cows Bossy and then wondered why they kicked over the pail.)
Posted by: Joanna Bourne | Wednesday, July 14, 2010 at 02:11 PM
Poor edward has to do his work after dinner and he couldn’t go with us to play football. Because he dare not go against his mother’s orders. What a pity!
Posted by: coach sale | Saturday, July 24, 2010 at 12:37 AM